Film Review: “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen”

Salmon Fishing
The Sheik and Dr. Jones. © CBS Films 2011 (fair use)

What comes along as a congenial, mildly satirical romantic comedy is actually British cinema’s latest effort in imperialist propaganda, updated to the 21st century.
Let’s look at the plot first (SPOILER alert):
A nerdy, unhappy and somewhat obsolete scientist-turned-civil-clerk, fishery expert Dr. Alfred Jones (played by the great Ewan McGregor), is approached by investment capital manager Harriet (Emily Blunt) to take part in an insane project: A rich sheik wants to introduce salmon fishing into his native Yemen – not just for cracks, but for the “sense of humility” it provides.
Since the powers that be, read: The British Government, want a “good news story from the Middle East”, they endorse the enterprise. Kristin Scott Thomas plays cynical but powerful PR agent Patricia, who seems to hold a direct grip on the Prime Minister (of a Labour government, so it seems, since there is loads of talk about “the Party”, a classic anti-leftist meme). Driven by domestic problems and unfavourable superiors, Dr. Jones has no chance but to take part in the endeavour.
It seems to be an exercise in the absurd, but ultimately the film is about the power of faith: A faith in a higher “cause” that elevates the characters of the involved and even sponsors the opportunity to fall in love.
Now, we might waste a bit of time on the representation of characters, nationalities and gender.
The government bureaucrats are, of course, laughing stock. Not so, however, is the British Army: Soldier Robert, Harriet’s love interest, is a slightly clumsy but decent character. She never questions why he goes out into war with a Black Op mission, leaving her in the darkness about his whereabouts and other details. This is the course of war, and even in her grief for the lost soldier she never once questions the meaning of this war. A strong, well-educated (she speaks Cantonese) woman, holding a responsible position within the project, Harriet nevertheless is clearly dependent on the love of this sincere patriot, a dependency she can only overcome when she attaches to another man.
Besides veneration of the military and unbalanced gender roles, there is another, very disturbing streak in the film. Sheik Muhammad (Amr Waked) is portrayed as a just, honorable and faithful man, with a bit of “noble savage” put into the mixture. Notably, this noble sheik has the only speaking role of his ethnicity. There also is a legion of nameless servants (some dressed up fancily in turbans and kilts, perhaps as a marriage of Celtic and Arabic anti-modernism), and the obligatory Islamic terrorists, whose evil deeds are explained as “midunderstanding” of the noble intentions of the semi-westernized sheik. In bad old orientalist fashion, “Salmon Fishing in the Yemen” has earned itself another chapter in “Reel Bad Arabs”, Jack Shaheen‘s account of the racist extravanganzas of Western movies.
Adding injury to insult is at the core of the film, the fantastical project of building a great dam and importing aquaculture salmon into the Yemen. Ecologists would possibly cry out in pain if this was a real project: Introducing a foreign, predatory species into a complex ecosystem of an arid region is nothing less but an environmental crime. Finally, even the unique selling point of the plot is an (eco-)imperialist madness.
Some folks within British cinema still seem to dream of world domination, they do it in style, and the whole thing smells fishy.

Food Chain Teaser from Sanjay Rawal on Vimeo.

Upcoming documentary “Food Chain”, to be released in the U.S. in the end of August, focuses on the hard everyday life of farmworkers.

“There is more interest in food now than ever before, yet, no one is talking about the people who pick our food, the hundreds of thousands of hard working individuals to whom we are all connected through our purchases at supermarkets, farmers’ markets and restaurants.

FOOD CHAIN explores the state of labor within the agriculture sector in the US and the immoral practices that affect the lives of countless thousands of farm workers.”

The Curious Story of Brazil’s Deforestation

What will be the fate of Brazil’s rainforest? Photo: Lubasi

Food production is at the core of Brazil’s continuing deforestation.

The main cause is grazing cattle, which accounts for up to 70% of rainforest decimation.

The large-scale destruction of tropical rainforest is not only responsible for dramatic loss of biodiversity and social problems of indigenous and other forest-dependent people, it also makes Brazil a climate culprit. Rainforests are enormous carbon sinks, so deforestation leads to about 20% of greenhouse gas emissions.

The economic exploitation of the Brazilian Amazon is a story that goes back to the modernization strategies of the Vargas Presidency. Deforestation then took on speed from the 1970s on. The Amazon was meant to be a giant to be tamed, a wilderness which had to be civilzed. The modernization paradigm shifted when the insight gained ground that the Brazilian rainforest was a valuable ressource for the whole world. The 1992 Earth Summit marked a turning point in deforestation policies. Brazil made promise to halt deforestation.

Brazil’s effort seemingly had a positive effect, since the rates of rainforest cleared fell from about 18.000 square kilometres in 2000 to about 6.000 square kilometres in 2010, according to the Brazilian Government.

A new rise in deforestation rates reported in 2011, mainly due to soybean production in the state of Mato Grosso, proofed to be disheartening to environmentalists. They were particularly worried about a new “forest code” that was brought into Brazilian parliament in 2012. President Dilma Roussef vetoed the new law, although not in its entirety. The law, had it passed in its originally proposed form, would have given large amnesties to illegal logging operations.

“Ecowarrior” organization Greenpeace, represented by their Brazilian branch, is now tackling deforestation in Amazonia with full force. With their “Desmatamento Zero” (Zero Deforestation) campaign, Greenpeace Brazil aims to bring a popular law initiative into Congress which will prohibit further deforestation.

However, the Amazonian rainforest always had powerful political enemies. The acme of profiteering from deforestation is soybean baron Blairo Maggi, who was governor of Mato Grosso, the federal state massively affected by the policies of his company. He had excellent relations to the Lula government, an ambiguous alliance for Brazil’s popular president who had sworn to halt deforestation.

All in all, Maggi’s success seems to be symptomatic for the current Brazilian development model, as a new publication by the Heinrich-Böll-Foundation suggests. This model is based on large-scale extraction of natural ressources and exports of goods like sugar cane, soybean, beef and agroethanol. While a growing middle class also profits from this economic growth miracle, this model is anything but sustainable. Because one thing is for sure: Deforestation in Brasil, a fragmented and complex process, is driven by strong economic interest, as Thomas Fatheuer explains. After cattle, soybean and sugarcane, also large-scale hydroelectric projects, oil exploitation and mining as well as timber are key industries which have negative impacts on the Brazilian rainforest; these factors also provoke manifest protest of indigenous groups.

This is a story which has no ending - the Brazilian Amazon, a mythical place and a site of immense profit-making, will continue to spur environmental conflict for years and decades to come.